blondenplastic reviewed Version 1 -
Read 100%% of the Item
This is just a personal opinion. I don’t like the title. I think you can come up with something more creative and alluring.
In the second paragraph your use of a semi-colon is a bit jarring. I would use an em-dash instead (--). ”It’s not a real dog, mind you--at least not in the way you or I would think of it as being real.” Whenever you use a semi-colon, you have to ask yourself if you can replace it with a period. If you can’t, then you’ve used it incorrectly.
Maybe it’s because your narrator is drunk, but I’m confused when you compare the dog to a real dog, you say that it’s just like a real dog except that it’s breathing. Don’t real dogs breathe? Later you talk about its two mouths, so maybe you’d be better off saying that it was just like a real dog except that it had two mouths. At least it would make more sense later when you bring pull this detail out of nowhere.
One of my problems is that I use the word ‘seem’ too much, and I’ve picked up on you doing it too, but you also over-use apparently. If it’s apparent, you don’t have to state that it’s apparent.
“For a moment, I wonder how many roaches it takes to fill an 8×10 dining room, but then I stop and add it to the mental filing cabinet marked Things I’m Probably Better Off Not Knowing.” This is my favourite line so far. It’s the first relatable line I’ve come across, the first line with real truth.
“If the dog had been wearing a collar, then the roaches would be at collar-level now.” This could be replaced with “The dog was up to his neck in roaches.” Don’t complicate things. You have to remember that your narrator is drunk—he’s not going to be so articulate.
This is the first mention of the two mouths, and it’s confusing as hell: “The dog’s up to the first mouth in roaches now, and that second mouth is still spewing roaches.” I have no idea what that means.
You’ve got to ditch the clichés—or at least trim them down. You can’t use “cool as a cucumber” twice and so close together (and a bunch more times later). Clichés are lazy, they make me want to quit reading (which is also lazy, but if the author doesn’t want to put in the effort, why should I?).
”...but the dog’s eyes tell me what it’s tongue can’t.” Huh? Also “it’s” means “it is”. The word you’re looking for is “its”.
There are some grammatical errors that you should rectify. I suggest you get a copy of Strunk & White’s The Elements of Style. It will help you sort out some of those unnecessary commas.
“The roaches seem like they’re ready to burst the seams of whatever it is that’s holding them back.” I don’t get this line. I don’t like how you used “seem”, especially when you put the other “seam” in the same sentence. This piece would work a lot better if things did not seem to be but just were. You would keep the reader in the moment more, and for a piece like this I think that is important.
“In a few minutes, they’ll be ready to burst the seams again, right around the time the bottle gives up it’s last taste.” Now it sounds as though the roaches are going to burst out of their skin instead of this imaginary border that holds them back. Again with “it’s”. If you’re serious about publishing, that’s something you should know.
“the roaches start toeing the line again.” This is the first time you mention toeing the line, so how can they be doing it again? Besides that, it’s just another cliché that you can do with out.
I know that I’ve focused more on the negative than the positive, but I’m not here to coddle you. If you show this to an editor they’d be a lot harsher. Clichés are redundant on their own, so, before you can think of publishing this, you’ve got to can them—especially the repeated ones.
I don’t know what you want me to walk away with from this story. Right now all I’m thinking is “So what?” Who has time for alcoholics?