Poetry / Philosopher of anarchy (Analysis)

Very nice, flows very well and isn’t at all vague (I do like to actually know what a poem was talking about when I get to the end of it!)
I am making an assumption that the lack of punctuation, and the lack of structure is an intended thing, as a visual image of what the words are telling the reader. If not intended, well I think it does that, so well done to your subconcious!

Very good work here I have read!  Clever, and reads comfortably, and at the end, I got the warm heart as well.  What a beautiful creation you have given  to us, for becoming stronger.  

I like it, what can I say?  I hate reviews that say that to me, but there it is.

The anarchist, it seems at first, is going to have a voice.  And then they refer to themselves as no one.  Anarchists tend to have the perception that hte world can be changed one minor chaotic event at a time.  So one could make a difference.

Also, an anarchist probably wouldn’t ‘just walk through and wait for the philosopher or revolutionist to change things…they rebel against philosophers and revoltunionist.

Just some things to think on…although I see why the narrator feels an anarchist.  My favorite part was, ironically:

I am no one
just walking through
waiting for the philosopher
the revolutionary
to change all I know
and hated

Being the philosopher of anarchy, perhaps you are the very one for whom you wait to change the things you hate :)  

Thanks for the read!  Quite interesting and individualistic!

A lot of life to consider in your words

Hmmmmm…..

I think I know where you were headed with this one, but I’m not certain that you arrived.   You set up a pretext like a multiple personality disorder--   you are everyone, but no one.   It would seem that more tension would drive the piece if there was a dominant personality, unsure of itself certainly--  but striving to come to grips with the other forces of inner nature….

But without that….   your piece may be eveything; but nothing at all.

I liked it.