Thank you Blue— you’ll always be a star to me!
Poetry / First Amongst Equals
First amongst equals, he was
Of a peculiar kind of breed
Not given to extravagances
That glitterati seem to need
Ruminating with real passion
Over life’s sundry vital bits
And the discordant harmonics
Of the odd conniption fit
He was, all in all, just a man
Not perfect, and not uptight—
But resolved always to be fair
To do what he thought right
He had but few possessions
Some books—not much more
But of love, he had plenty
And his children he adored
His wife was his comfort
Who filled his every need
With a symbiotic synergy
That few loves can exceed
He fell in the chill autumn
His estate, spare—and small
A few items of significance—
Love, the finest of them all
Keith Allen Scalf
4-19-08
You need to log in to urbis or create an urbis account to review this writing.
Reviews
Sort Reviews by Newest | Oldest | Highest Quality | Lowest Quality | Newest Comments |
I’m sorry to say that this particular poem has a very forced feeling to it. The use of simpler words would have made it flow more easily. To me, the phrase ‘symbiotic synergy’ particularly is complete overkill. The two words really don’t fit well, and after the statement that the wife (who) filled his every need, it really isn’t such a symbiotic relationship after all in the truest sense of the word…or, if it is, then the word synergy isn’t really applicable. I think if the author tried to be less informal (meaning don’t try so hard to rhyme) the poem would write itself more easily.
- add/view comments (1)
A gentle and smoothly flowing love poem is what this is. No problems in grammar or spelling that I could see. It portrays the kind of man every woman would like to have lighting the dark corners of life, and too seldom gets. It has nice rhyming and rhythm.
I’m usually not fond of rhyming meters, but this one successfully makes the rhyme secondary to the flow of the piece. Wonderfully crafted in that.
Fix your title. Amongst is not appropriate. It should simply be “Among”. Amongst is far too archaic for the tone of this piece.
Otherwise, a great memorial piece.
This poem has some really good aspects, but the rhythm is a little awkward when read out loud. There always seems to be too many syllables in the second lines of each stanza which make it hard to connect the rhymes.
I really enjoyed the stanza about the wife. “Symbiotic energy” is a good description. There is a lot of good vocabulary use in this piece.
Showing 1 - 4 of 4
GENERAL
REVIEW QUEUE
Ratings & Rankings





Review item
Add to faves

