take this and make a poem or a song, the idea here begs more and it seems like you might have something useful to say if you expounded upon it a little more.

or if they pushed you into a vacuum. or punched you in the diaphragm. otherwise, interesting quoting.

i agree entirely.

are they not one and the same?

or fuels it, depending on perspective. may be revise in a manner that warns against faith halting curiosity?

independent of the poem i dont find this to be of sufficient matter to be a stand alone piece. i also do not understand the necessity for a partially caps locked word.

fortunately thorns arent scented, so yes. i dont think this quote is quite as rhetorical as it is intended

aside from the second to last stanza, i was bored. the rhymes seemed forced and stale. word choice in parts of the piece interrupted the over all flow and your poetic style ranges from promising to something a stroke victim would say. the meter is disjointed and lends no creative support to the topic. it is as you say in your note to reviewers "silly", but thats all it is.

we're, a contraction formed by linking "we" and "are" were: the past tense of "are" other than that, this was passable. vague, but acceptably so.

first stanza last line, pluralize "one". the piece craves greater detail, more to hook and interest a reader. it also feels like its going somewhere, but it ends so abruptly.